Posting falsehood about Matthew 28:19 and 1 John 5:7 does not make you “wanting to open dialogue.” Until you can be honest about the text and stop trying to rip out verses that do not fit the traditions of men you have been taught then “dialogue” would be a fruitless endeavor, since you do not care about the truth or have any desire for truth. When you decide you want honest discussion then feel free to comment.
Th reason I only dealt with the English is because the whole “one name” argument is made by people based on the English and their lack of understanding of basic grammar rules. Matthew was originally written in Greek and the King James Bible reading is the same as the Greek:
πορευθεντες ουν μαθητευσατε παντα τα εθνη βαπτιζοντες αυτους εις το ονομα του πατρος και του υιου και του αγιου πνευματος
HonorTheSon
October 29, 2013 @ 1:29 am
Posting falsehood about Matthew 28:19 and 1 John 5:7 does not make you “wanting to open dialogue.” Until you can be honest about the text and stop trying to rip out verses that do not fit the traditions of men you have been taught then “dialogue” would be a fruitless endeavor, since you do not care about the truth or have any desire for truth. When you decide you want honest discussion then feel free to comment.
HonorTheSon
October 29, 2013 @ 2:01 am
Th reason I only dealt with the English is because the whole “one name” argument is made by people based on the English and their lack of understanding of basic grammar rules. Matthew was originally written in Greek and the King James Bible reading is the same as the Greek:
πορευθεντες ουν μαθητευσατε παντα τα εθνη βαπτιζοντες αυτους εις το ονομα του πατρος και του υιου και του αγιου πνευματος
LoneYukon
October 29, 2013 @ 2:24 am
i can appreciate the English prepositional rules….how does the original Aramaic, Hebrew or Greek compare in each passage?